On 17/10/2005, at 1:20 AM, Eric Scheid wrote:

I'd prefer that our use of 'prev' and 'next' be consistent with other uses elsewhere, where 'next' traverses from the current position to the one that
*follows*, whether in time or logical order. Consider the use of
'first/next/prev/last' with chapters or sections rendered in HTML.

I'm starting to think that the way to fix this is to make it more specific, so that it doesn't get conflated with other uses; e.g., "prev-archive".


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Reply via email to