James M Snell wrote: > > Thomas Broyer wrote: >> Depends whether @rel="self" was really meant for subscribing and the >> spec wording is not precise enough about it; this could then be fixed >> with an errata rather than create a new link relation >> Otherwise, +0.5, because it seems to overlap @rel="first" (or "last"?) >> or I missed something >> > "self" should always point to the feed document containing the self > link. It makes no sense to have a "self" link in a feed that does not > point to itself.
Right, off course My apologies So +0.5 to "subscribe" because it seems to overlap "first" (or "last"?) or I missed something ;o) -- Thomas Broyer
