On 19/10/05 5:38 AM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have code that uses "next" for this. Why do we want to change it? Why did you choose "next"? e.
On 19/10/05 5:38 AM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have code that uses "next" for this. Why do we want to change it? Why did you choose "next"? e.