* Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-23 23:40]: > Well, Tim seemed to have a pretty strong -1 on 'subscribe', > whereas you say you can live with 'current'. So, at this point > it looks like 'current', unless other people come forward. I > flirted with "recent" briefly; anybody strongly like that one?
I like “recent” better than “current,” and I agree with Tim on “subscribe.” But neither of the alternatives seems like a great fit. I thought about it for a while and came up with “live.” It would seem to me that it describes the link target with a qualtatively stronger assertion than either “current” or “recent,” and that it is more likely to intuitively convey what it’s supposed to mean, ie “if you want to subscribe to something, this link is the best candidate.” But ultimately I’m okay with any of the non-“subscribe” propositions. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
