Robert Sayre wrote:
On 11/30/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Sayre wrote:
I noticed you moved PaceFeedsNotCollections and PaceSimpleIntroduction
into the Closed section.
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg03545.html
And, unless I misinterpreted, both Paul and Tim confirmed via email
and/or IM that this was their intent;
That message concerned PaceServiceDescription, which has been moved to
Recommended For Closure. No argument there. PaceFeedsNotCollections
and PaceSimpleIntroduction were moved directly to Closed. Once again,
I'm not arguing, just asking that the WG's decision be documented
explicitly.
Both were moved from the 'not yet taken up' to the 'currently under
discussion' section the last cycle:
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg17547.html
Re-reading Tim's "Search for Introspection Consensus" and Paul's
"Tallying the survey", I now have serious doubts that they this covers
PaceSimpleIntroduction, so I'm moving that back to "revisit". If it
turns out that that PaceFeedsNotCollections was not included in what Tim
was referring to by "introspection via feeds/links", then I'll move this
one back too.
- Sam Ruby
