On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:01:39AM -0500, Alan Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said:
> I'm to understand that Atom has adopted the Tag URI as a a perferred > GUID for an Atom 1.0 feed. I've begun to use the Tag URI in my work. RFC 4151 (on tag URIs) is not even mentioned by RFC 4287. (Although one example use these URI.) > It is instead an opaque URI. It seems perfectly normal: the tag URI has a structure only for the purpose of *creating* an unique identifier. For *reading* it, it should be regarded as opaque. It is not even resolvable (and does not pretend to be). > Had Tag URI been specified as a heirarical, the parser would be able > to extract more payload from the URI. To do what?
