Elliotte Harold wrote:
No. It's not even well-formed much less valid.
I personally assumed that the </foo:Person> was an unintended error.. after accounting for such, the example is valid.
- James
Elliotte Harold wrote:
No. It's not even well-formed much less valid.
I personally assumed that the </foo:Person> was an unintended error.. after accounting for such, the example is valid.
- James