Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Is there somewhere a comprehensive survey of the current level of support in readers, with details for each feature, specially the most Atom-specific?
There are a couple of basic tests on the Atom wiki [1] including an <updated> test. They're not very comprehensive, but the pass rate doesn't seem to be very good even with what's there.
I tested content=xhtml support for several readers and none does it properly. I would like to have information for other readers.
I've done some testing there myself (only Windows and online aggregators though). My finding was that you'd get much better results with escaped html, but if you're willing (and able) to avoid any characters that require escaping and don't try anything fancy with namespaces, the support isn't that bad.
Out of interest, which aggregators were you testing, and what specifically caused them to fail?
Regards James [1] http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/CategoryConformanceTests
