Regarding the following four link relations there seem to be some inconsistencies with (or maybe only within) the APP 0.7 draft (but hopefully the editors of 0.8 have caught those already ;-):
Attribute Value: previous Attribute Value: next Attribute Value: first Attribute Value: last
In section 9.1 of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-07 it is first stated that an '[..] Atom feed document MAY contain link elements with "rel" attribute values of "next", "previous", "start" and "end" [...]'. There is a mismatch between the last two values and the ones proposed for registration: "first" and "last".
Two paragraphs further down section 9.1 starts using "prev" throughout -- instead of "previous", as proposed to the IANA.
These inconsistencies should be resolved, IMHO, ideally by using "prev", "next", "start", and "end", since at least the first three values mimic their functionally similar HTML counterparts. And APP should follow the rule of least astonishment here.
Regards, Andreas Sewe
