I personally think that the feedvalidator is being too anal about updated handling. Entries with the same atom:id value MUST have different updated values, but the spec says nothing about entries with different atom:id's.
- James James Yenne wrote: > I'm using the feedvalidtor.org to validate a feed with entries > containing atom:updated that may have the same datetime, although > different atom:id. The validator complains that two entries cannot have > the same value for atom:updated. I generate these feeds and the > generator uses the current datetime, which may be exactly the same. I > don't understand why the validator should care about these > updated values from different entries per atom:id - these are totally > unrelated entries. Is the validator wrong? It seems that otherwise I > have to play tricks to make these entries have different updated within > the feed. > > I'm not sure how this relates to the thread "More on atom:id handling" > > Thanks, > James
