David Powell wrote: > 03. atom:published > > While atom:updated is converted to pubDate, atom:published is kept as > atom:published; except, the date format is converted to RFC822 format. > I think that the date format should be kept as-is in ISO8601-style > format.
Why is atom:updated converted to pubDate? If any atom date is converted to pubDate, why isn't it atom:published? - Sam Ruby
