It isn't "wiki". Those are used in blogs, and I use Markdown for simple HTML memos.
Don't use "x-", either. Register a real type. wunder --On March 7, 2006 5:51:42 PM +0100 Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6 Mar 2006, at 18:54, James Tauber wrote: >> Agreed that this would be very useful and also that it needs to be >> done >> on a per wiki format basis. > > Is there a forum a large number of them tend to hang out on, so that one > could ask them to think about this? What would be the best to do in the > meantime? Something like > > text/x-wiki+textile > text/x-wiki+markdown > > perhaps? > > >> I think, however, that this is something the format creators should be >> encouraged to register, or at least suggest a convention for. >> >> James >> >> On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 07:59:10 -0800, "Walter Underwood" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> >>> --On March 6, 2006 3:59:39 PM +0100 Henry Story >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Silly question probably, but is there a wiki mime type? >>>> I was thinking of "text/wiki" or "text/x-wiki" or something. >>>> >>>> I want people to be able to edit their blogs in wiki format in >>>> BlogEd and be able >>>> to distinguish when they do that from when they enter plain >>>> text, html or xhtml. >>>> Perhaps this is also useful for the protocol. >>> >>> It would be really useful, especially for feeds that archive the >>> content >>> of a blog. It would be best to use the official names of the formats, >>> like >>> "text/markdown" or "text/textile". The wikis and blogs that I use >>> can be >>> configured to accept different formats, so "text/wiki" doesn't work. >>> >>> wunder >>> -- >>> Walter Underwood >>> Principal Software Architect, Autonomy >>> >> -- >> James Tauber http://jtauber.com/ >> journeyman of some http://jtauber.com/blog/ > > -- Walter Underwood Principal Software Architect, Autonomy
