* James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-09 21:10]: >>* Sean Lyndersay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-09 17:05]: >>>I argue that the right thing for a publisher is to serve HTML >>>when they want control over the look and feel of the entire >>>set of content, and to serve RSS/Atom when they want their >>>data consumed as a feed (which has always meant surrendering >>>the look-and-feel to the particular client the user chooses). >> >>+1 >> > >Sure, serving XHTML is just a one off for my app, but part of my >goal is to clarify this behavioral standard for the browser / >feed reader / aggregator community.
I think that feeds should behave like feeds. Try to differentiate on the content, not the looks, if you want more readers. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
