James M Snell wrote:
The Feed Thread draft has been updated.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-07.txt
I am an absolutely terrible proofreader so I'd really appreciate it if
someone could do a quick scan over the current doc to find the typos
that I know must be scattered throughout.
Section 4, paragraph 1:
"into a separate feed document" (singular document)
"its value is assumed" (no apostrophe)
Section 4, last paragraph:
"neither does it explicitly allow" (is -> it)
Section 6:
"Security considerations: (see section 5)" (6 -> 5)
Not a proofreading issue, but shouldn't section 5 say something about DOS
attacks using replies links to third party servers? I wouldn't be surprised
if some clients automatically subscribed to all replies links in a feed even
if they were 100MB zip files on a completely different site.
Regards
James
