On 5/17/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have to disagree that there is no technical reason. There is no way to sanely associate additional information with a link element.
Sure there is, and it's the way James did it. Is the information valuable? Does the spec cover cardinality issues? Is the link element useful here? Was the spec less effective in its previous incarnation? The answer to all of these questions is no. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
