>From: Nicolas Krebs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard >(draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread) >Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:55:47 +0200
>> - 'Atom Threading Extensions ' >> <draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-10.txt> as a Proposed Standard >In section 3, this draft give an xml element corresponding to In-reply-to: >(rfc 2822 section 3.6.4). Therefore, the draft do not give an equivalent to >References: 822' header field (rfc 2822 section 3.6.4) (wich could be usefull >to build a mail --> atom gateway). > >The section 7.2. do not mention rfc 2822. Sorry, my mistake. This draft give in section 3 an xml element corresponding to In-reply-to of rfc 2822 section 3.6.4. However the draft do not give an equivalent to the header field References of rfc 2822 section 3.6.4, which could be usefull to build mail --> atom gateway and usenet --> atom gateway, and to find all previous message in a thread. The section 7.2. do not mention rfc 2822.
