On May 18, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:
Look at that giant email. Seems to me that it's a debate taking place for no discernable reason. There's no technical reason for the placement of the attributes, and management has made it clear that any objections are "irrelevant."
I realize that the placement of the attributes is one choice among many. Sometimes you just have to make a choice and there's no reason beyond "it needs to go somewhere". I've been trying to understand if there's a technical problem with the draft's chosen placement of the attributes and the best case I've seen is that "that location is technically disallowed by RFC4287", an assertion which is disputed (alas, natural language meanings are often disputed).
Am I missing something in the case against the choice of location for the metadata?
Thanks, Lisa
