* Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-23 17:20]: > As we have already seen on this list, RFC4287 lacks of > precision in some context, therefore I wonder what being > "exactly correct" represents.
Did I miss something? I remember several oversights of omission, but none of imprecision. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
