I'm shooting for at least five demerits. Otherwise, the week will be completely sunk. And yes, the parser would be conformant. Abdera is conformant even tho it is possible to use Abdera to produce and read invalid Atom. Returning the div in the "getContent" method is incorrect and I'm fixing that now; making the div available for the application using Abdera should be ok. I want to make sure this conformance test isn't saying that the parser must hide the div completely.
- James Robert Sayre wrote: > On 6/27/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please define "conformance" in regards to this test. That is, what is >> the exact behavior that a library must perform when a code library has >> an API like, "getContent" on the content element. >> >> e.g., is a parser not conformant if it passes the DIV on to the >> consuming application with the expectation that the application is >> responsible for "doing the right thing" with it? > > Don't be dense. Would the parser be conformant if it passed on the > feed, entry, and div elements with that expectation? I'll file a bug > on UFP and I bet you it'll get fixed without a question, because there > won't be a bad-faith interpretation to fight. That's two demerits this > week for you. Tsk tsk. >
