On 8/31/06, Asbjørn Ulsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:50:56 +0200, Sam Ruby < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Also, there are a number of tools that attempt to produce well-formed
> XHTML, but don't do so consistently enough to drop the content into an
> Atom feed in such a manner.
But is it possible to check the wellformedness of the markup inside
atom:content and suggest that the authors use 'type="xhtml"' instead of
'type="html"' if it is indeed wellformed X(HT)ML? It's a real stretch in
terms of how far the validator should go, but I can definately see its
usefulness.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
