Yes, that's what it means, which I'll definitely admit is odd. I think there is a massive gray area here that needs to be worked out. I'm not sure how to work it out.
- James John Panzer wrote: >[snip] > (Is it just me, or is there too much overloading of "metadata" here?) > > Also, does this mean that an entry license would apply to this content: > > <content type="image/gif">TWFuIGlzIGRpc3Rpbmd1aXNoZWQsIG</content> > > but not to the same content communicated through an indirect link? > > <content type="image/gif" src="http://example.org/catpicture001.gif"/> > > (I'm deliberately picking a GIF picture as I believe there's no good > solution for embedding license metadata inside GIFs. ) > > -John Panzer >
![http://example.org/catpicture001.gif"/](http://example.org/catpicture001.gif"/){kind=link}