Hey Mark - Things are looking good to me.
Couple questions, comments: 1. I think your document might need to address what's supposed to happen if duplicate items are discovered when trolling through the paged info. Newer replaces older? (That makes the most sense to me) Although I guess the argument might be, "what's an 'item'?". 2. We're currently recommending 'feed history' as a best practice for Media RSS. http://search.yahoo.com/mrss (I'll need to update that link in the documentation) Thanks- David > From: Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 4 October 2006 11:13:06 AM > To: Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org> > Subject: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 > > > I've only had positive comments about -07 so far, so I've > recommended it for publication as a Proposed Standard to the IESG. > > As part of that process, I'm issuing an informal, pseudo-WG Last > Call on the document to capture any remaining feedback. In particular, > > * What do people think about putting this document on the Standards > Track? > > * Do you have an implementation available, in progress, planned, etc.? > > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed- > history/ > > Please provide feedback by October 18th. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
