Robert Sayre wrote:
fwiw, I have no intention of reading the Snell bidi draft, or
implementing what might be inside. As I've mentioned several times, I
am already implementing a solution. I will document it and roll it
onto the standards track as an update to RFC4287.
To be clear, I have no intention of ignoring input from this list, since
that almost always results in improvements. I also have no intention of
implementing anything that should have approval from the group, unless I
have that approval. However, I don't think I'm obligated to let our more
enthusiastic participants dictate the manner and pace of my personal
contributions.
-Rob
