On 18 Oct 2006, at 16:10, John Panzer wrote:
My assumption: Tim is correct. The server controls
atom:updated. While
the client is required to provide a valid atom:updated element, the
server can (and in most cases will) ignore that value.
Completely disagree.
If the server controls atom:updated then what was the point of
the whole discussion of app:edited?
the client controls app:edited. It is the client who decides what
if there was a significant change.
The server controls app:edited. Any edit, changes app:edited.
I think you have a typo somewhere in the above.
Duh. You are right. I wish there were unit tests for typing docs. Why
is it one always has to test everything in life?
I meant:
If the server controls atom:updated then what was the point of the
whole discussion of app:edited?
The client controls atom:updated. It is the client who decides what a
significant change is.
The server controls app:edited. Any edit changes app:edited.
Henry
