2006/11/2, Henry Story:
On 2 Nov 2006, at 08:59, Thomas Broyer wrote: > [redirecting to atom-syntax] This is also a protocol issue, because we are asking what to do with the information in the atom feed. [1]
Not sure how atom-protocol is concerned but let's keep it in atom-protocol too...
> 2006/11/1, Houghton,Andrew: >> >> concept scheme URI: http://my.scheme.net/my-vocabulary/ >> concept URI: http://my.concept.net/my-vocabulary/13745 > <category > scheme="http://my.scheme.net/my-vocabulary/"; > term="http://my.concept.net/my-vocabulary/13745"; > label="cats" > /> Thomas, I don't think that this is a natural reading of "term" in the atom syntax list.
Andrew Houghton was talking about SKOS (which I don't know anything about) and said: [[ However, in SKOS you have a URI to the concept "cats", period. You could map the domain to be the SKOS concept scheme's URI and use the concepts label as the category content in Atom. But concatenating the SKOS concept scheme URI and the concept label doesn't necessarily produce the URI to the concept. For example, in SKOS you might have the following: concept scheme URI: http://my.categories.net/ concept URI for cats: http://my.categories.net/13745 concept label for cats: cats ]] My answer is a bare mapping of this description into an atom:category element.
[[ The "term" attribute is a string that identifies the category to which the entry or feed belongs. Category elements MUST have a "term" attribute. ]] nowhere is there mentioned a IRI there,
IRIs are not forbidden either, and Andrew's description makes me think the "concept URI" *is* the "term". -- Thomas Broyer
