Judy-
On 11/9/06, Asbjørn Ulsberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 06:47:23 +0100, Judy Piper < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was expecting a Namespace document that explains the namespace URI
> itself and the relationship between the spec and the URI. Am I wrong to
> expect this behavior?
What is to be expected when resolving a namespace URI is undefined, but a
common solution is to have a document explaining what the URI means and
how the vocabulary residing in that namespace can be used. In other words;
just as you say. Redirecting directly to the specification works, but an
informative and perhaps more human friendly document inbetween would
indeed be nice.
A good example is the XHTML namespace URI:
<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml>
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
