Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>[snip]
>> Move Autodiscovery forward as an Informational RFC
>
> But if it were published as an informational RFC, what purpose would it
> serve?
>
To document best practice as it relates specifically to syndication
feeds. For example, HTML5 says nothing about whether the relative order
of feed autodiscovery links within a document is significant. The Atom
autodiscovery draft, however, defines that the order is significant.
> I intend to post a much more substantial review of the current draft
> shortly, but for now, see my comments on the RSS Autodiscovery spec,
> some of which will also apply to the Atom Autodiscovery spec.
>
Excellent. FWIW, I agree with just about all of your comments.
- James
