Depends... is the client expected to process each discreet set of entries as part of a single logical set or is each discreet set expected to be processed as it's own complete set? The former would be equivalent to the way most feed readers work today. The latter would be equivalent to subscribing to a new feed each time. In the former, each feed should have the same atom:id; in the latter, each feed should have a unique atom:id.
- James Bill de hOra wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm sending entries over XMPP packaged up as feeds. A question that has > come up - should the feed's atom:id change each time a feed is sent, or > should it remain the same for all feeds issued from a client? > > cheers > Bill > >