On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:41:36 +0100, Andreas Sewe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The OP has a (different) point, though: Recommending distinct file
extensions for "application/atom+xml; type=entry" and
application/atom+xml; type=feed" is worthwhile.
If, e.g., the mime.types shipped with Apache already contains
appropriate entries, this would aid the fast adoption of the new,
parameterized "application/atom+xml". Hence it would be worthwhile to
include file extension recommendations in the I-D.
Indeed. +1.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
