James,

what draft do you refer to?

Thanks,
Jan

On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M Snell wrote:


I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to
go anywhere.  My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire
again without any further modifications.

- James


Reply via email to