On 04/28/2015 11:05 AM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> I haven't tested this, but it came to mind when reading about --cgroup-parent.
>
> Think we can use --cgroup-parent to create resource jails around daemon ops
> like build/load/import/save ?
>
> I worry about fairness (especially disk I/O) when daemon tasks like the above
> are co-located with "prodcution" apps.
>
> That is, until/unless we have support for dedicated image builder machines,
> or support for multiple docker backend graph directories. Clayton?
>
If these happen at the client, then the they would be controlled by the
cgroup that the client is running under.
