On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:47:57PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > It was already decided that Atomic was non-blocking, though I don't > have the reference to hand.
Specifically, it wasn't decided to be blocking, and non-blocking is the default. :) > The benefit is being able to seamlessly rebase between the > CentOS/RHEL Atomic Host and Fedora. That is really cool! > What I'm arguing is it's far, far better to take this one time pain > before deployment gets even larger. Honestly, I think with Atomic at its current state, we might be able to just document that upgrades aren't possible across these releases - please take your containers and re-deploy 'em on a new host. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Fedora Project Leader mat...@fedoraproject.org <http://fedoraproject.org/>
