On 01/06/2016 02:58 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 01/06/2016 02:26 PM, Micah Abbott wrote: >> A few weeks ago, we looked at bugs reported against Project Atomic >> components (atomic, docker, kubernetes, ostree, etc.) under the Fedora >> product category and it was noticed that the QA Contact for many of these >> components is 'extras-qa@fedoraproject', which does not exist. This doesn't >> seem beneficial to the community and I think it could be changed to >> something more useful. (See this example - >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295790) >> >> I'd like to have a mailing list similar to 'atomic-bugs@redhat'. This is an >> internal mailing list that Red Hat employees can subscribe to and is used as >> the QA Contact for a number of the same components related to Project Atomic >> under the Red Hat product category. The benefit is that users can be >> notified about bugs that can affect the Project Atomic ecosystem without >> having to manually subscribe to individual bugs or components. (Example - >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293357) >> >> >> I reached out to some folks in the Fedora Infrastructure group about this >> and recently received a response with potential solutions. >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5037#comment:1 >> >> >> I'm not familiar enough with either solution, so I was hoping that the >> community could weigh in on what makes more sense. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Micah >> > I think you should choose option1. > Yeah, I want to create a pseudo user anyway to help track components.
Will try to get this done this week. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
