> > We need to support asciidoc for serious (lengthy) documentation use cases.
There's a stagnant group of us who are also intending to write official Fedora Docs, which needs reStructuredText support. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Aaron Weitekamp <aweit...@redhat.com> wrote: > We need to support asciidoc for serious (lengthy) documentation use cases. > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 03/04/2016 12:09 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >>> On 03/04/2016 02:24 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> >>>> Out of all the Atomic projects, what are people using for docs? Is it >>>> all ASCIIdoc, or do we have other formats? >>>> >>> >>> Most is Markdown. I'd recommend sticking with that excepting any >>> compelling need. Middleman will take ASCIIdoc, but I wouldn't want to >>> venture into anything beyond that. >>> >>> >> One of the reasons I'm asking is that if most things are markdown, we can >> consider using ReadTheDocs. But if we've got a lot of ASCIIDocs, we can't. >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Josh Berkus >> Project Atomic >> Red Hat OSAS >> >> >
