This should not be the Kubernetes channel. I can see why Sarah N gave a dubious response.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/25/2016 06:06 AM, Brandon Jozsa wrote: > > > > So would an Atomic SIG group in Kubernetes be the best, or is an Atomic > > group with a Kubernetes, Docker, Cockpit, Nelecule, RPM-OSTree SIG > > groups make the most sense? Just tossing some of my > > [sort-of-unimportant] thoughts out there. I kind of lean towards the > > latter, but in the end...*/anything/* is better than freaking email... > > Whereas I'm a big fan of email. > > Regarding the SIG group, the first hurdle is that Kubernetes may not > consider it appropriate for that. I've chatted briefly with Sarah N. on > this, and she's dubious. If Kubernetes says no, then the decision is easy. > > Ideally, we'd have a public RedHat Slack, so at least there would be > only one place to log in for all RH public projects. Let me bring that > idea up with OSAS. > > -- > -- > Josh Berkus > Project Atomic > Red Hat OSAS > >
