On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 07:42 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: > > the question here is "centos atomic" a rebuild of "redhat atomic" or > it's not that simple?
The current one that's promoted is the Core SIG rebuild, yes. I would also like to put more effort behind the SIG work. > the most important component would be the openshift router, since > currently there is no such component in atomic setup and without it's no > usable project can be deployed. Confusingly (because it hasn't been talked about a lot here in a coherent way), we do want to support that use case and some work has gone into ensuring that the operationally-focused aspects of OpenShift such as the registry and router are usable without the full PaaS. You can see some of this resulting in https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/blob/master/DEPLOYMENT_TYPES.md https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/blob/master/README_AEP.md We're still trying to work to share more with the great work happening in upstream OpenShift Origin and the communities it builds on like Kubernetes.
