Awesome! On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, 3:51 PM Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 09/14/2016 05:26 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > Nice article. > > I would like to stress that docker is intended to be process container not > system container. > > In adeal (aka. Fictional unicorn) containers you would have a single > process. Your start.sh should exec (to replace the shell) the application > ("exec node ." Or "exec java -jar start.jar") > > Many applications does not fit such restrictions. People end up using > things like supervisord (a python script that manage multiple processes ) > but of course it won't work out of the box. One need to rewrite services > into its .ini format. > > We have seen many fake systemds that are not 100% compatible. > > Having real systemd would make dockerizing such apps a trivial job. > > I would love if real systemd that just work. that fail gracefully for > example when it does not have cgroups mounted it would just ignore > cgroups-related directives. > > I wish if I just run > > docker run -dt fedora-systemd > > Without any -v > > How far are we from this? > > We have it now, that is what is talked about in the end of the article, > oci-systemd--hook. > > On Sep 13, 2016 8:55 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/09/13/running-systemd-in-a-non-privileged-container/ >> >> >> >