Then it's might be a good time to have detas for ws.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 6:39 PM Micah Abbott <miabb...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 03/29/2018 12:34 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >  > rpm-ostree upgrade --check
> >
> > it gives me,
> >
> > mporting metadata [=============] 100%
> > **
> >
> ERROR:src/app/rpmostree-dbus-helpers.c:1362:rpmostree_print_cached_update:
> > assertion failed: (g_variant_dict_lookup (&dict, "ref-has-new-commit",
> > "b", &is_new_checksum))
> > Aborted (core dumped)
>
> This looks like:
>
> https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1267
>
> You can work around it like so:
>
> "In the meantime, you can work around this by setting
> AutomaticUpdatePolicy in /etc/rpm-ostreed.conf to check (see
> rpm-ostreed.conf(5)). If you don't have the timer running, no checks
> will actually be performed in the background."
>
>
> > while "rpm-ostree upgrade" works fine, but I guess it's too much ~200MB,
> > we are supposed to get deltas aren't we?
>
> We have deltas for Fedora Atomic Host, but not for Atomic Workstation.
>
>
> > 466 metadata, 663 content objects fetched; 191,364 KiB transferred in
> > 163 seconds
> > Checking out tree e703ce3... done
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Matthias Clasen <mcla...@redhat.com
> > <mailto:mcla...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >         what is the command line that check for updates without applying
> >         the update? and list pending updates?
> >         is it pull?
> >
> >
> >     rpm-ostree upgrade --check
> >
> >
> >
> >         when an update came to atomic ws, it removed those (picture
> >         inlined, look at removals: 10 packages)
> >
> >         is there a way to carry those newly installed packages from the
> >         current layer into the updae?
> >
> >         rpm-ostree has all needed information to do this.
> >
> >         it knows they were added in the past
> >         it knows they are still missing in the update
> >         it knows how to merge (or rebase) them
> >
> >
> >     rpm-ostree upgrade does that - it keeps the exiting layer in place.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to