Thanks again for leading the meeting and thanks to everyone who participated as well. :)
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Matthias Clasen <mcla...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:13 AM Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Thanks Sinny for running this!! I have some responses to the questions >> below (and some suggestions) inline: >> >> On 04/03/2018 02:10 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: >> >> > ========================================== >> > #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_community >> > ========================================== >> >> Might be good if we named this similar to our other meeting, but with >> APAC in >> the title: #startmeeting fedora_atomic_wg_apac. And then the Subject of >> this >> mail could be "Fedora Atomic WG APAC Meeting Minutes". >> >> >> > Action Items >> > ------------ >> > * ksinny get answer for "Is there any plan to have a default flatpak >> > repo eventually ? e.g. flathub, maybe on provided by fedora, etc" >> >> I think there is a plan to have a fedora flatpak repo (built from Fedora >> RPMs) at some point in the future. For now flathub is the way to go. >> >> >> > Hey Sinny, > > yes, we need to have flatpaks enabled by default, eventually, since that > is the > preferred way to get desktop apps on an atomic workstation. > > We are working towards having flatpaks built from rpms inside fedora, which > will give us a repository we can enable by default without problems. Most > of > the code for this has been written, it just takes some time to get it > deployed > in production. > > We also need the ability to have flatpaks preinstalled on an atomic > workstation, > so we can stop including things like firefox in the OS image and use a > flatpak > for that instead. > > I have created tickets for these issues here: > https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic-workstation/issue > > Matthias >
