On 03/16/2016 07:49 AM, Andrej van der Zee wrote: > Hi Josh, > > > I'd guess most likely at the same time RHAH does. For one thing, we're > skipping 1.9 entirely becuase of the well-documented performance > problems, and upgrading to 1.10 is a somewhat painful migration process. > So not rolling out in a hurry. > > > Thanks for the update. > > I understand that 1.9 is skipped, but in half a year many new features > are added that are very useful. It would be nice to have them shipped > rather sooner than later!
Maybe you should be using Fedora Atomic Host, then? It has 1.9.1. -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS
