On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't think we can (currently at least) drop the whole cloud-init for > the Fedora Cloud Base, but for Atomic, we need to document what does > and doesn't work *anyway*, so why not use a variant that only > implements those things? This would be a) easier to test, b) less > bloaty, c) less risky as new upstream versions pull in new stuff for > functionality we don't necessarily need. Have we gotten away from having the same packages generally across cloud/Atomic/ Server? (Does server have cloud-init currently?) -- Joe Brockmeier Senior Evangelist, Linux Containers [email protected] Twitter: @jzb
