On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 23:58 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 23:38, Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > fails at the packaging step
> 
> Here's my patches so far (not as binary attachment this time!)

Thanks for all the work you are putting in this!

> ==============================================================
> --- /usr/include/v4l/linux/videodev2.h        2010-03-28 03:09:47.000000000 
> +0100
> +++ /usr/include/v4l/linux/videodev2.h.new    2010-11-21 19:18:26.000000000 
> +0000
> @@ -58,10 +58,11 @@
> 
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  #include <linux/time.h>     /* need struct timeval */
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #else
>  #include <sys/time.h>
> +#define __user
>  #endif
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/ioctl.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> ===============================================================

This suggest a respin of v4l packages, I'll see what that implies. Last
time I checked the backport tree wasn't being maintained anymore.
-- 
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel

Reply via email to