Hi, On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 09:53:55AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: > Hi Axel, > > I'm sure that they do, as I only added what was needed to get it to > compile and package all files. > > You just too fast - I wanted to send clamav too - but you had done i > too before I got there! > > I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good > shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile > there...
probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos. I guess soon we'll officially start building against f19. Features are 100% and the beta is just a few days ahead. > Thanks for the good repo!!! - I will go play with upgrading to > mythtv-0.26 on my f17 machine :-) Great!!! Let's know how that works out! > Regards, > Kim > > On 19-05-2013 09:22, Axel Thimm wrote: > >Thanks Kim, > > > >I had already uploaded new packages. Can you check whether they > >already have your changes? > > > > _______________________________________________ > atrpms-devel mailing list > atrpms-devel@atrpms.net > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel > -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
