On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:57:47AM +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote: > On 09/29/05 20:21, Matthias Hensler wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:41:40PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > >>[...] > >>>What I can do, is to rebuild the packages from ATrpms for my kernel > >>>versions (at least for i686-up) and either provide them on my page, > >>>or directly at ATrpms, whatever the best solution here is. > >> > >>Best thing would be at ATrpms, and even by the buildsystem there. > > > >Yes, good to hear, that would save me lots of CPU time and the need of > >an own buildsystem. > > Do you think it would make sense to combine the suspend2 and > reenable-8k-kernel-stack-for-xfs patches? (See > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=618 for details about the 8k > issue.)
I guess that would be Matthias' decision, but I would welcome it. AFAIK only the 8k/4k mixed stack patch needs to go into the kernel, and xfs will be built externally, right? > (At least for my XFS enabled laptop using hostap-kmdl this would > perfectly make sense. ;)) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpqDppTG9lxs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
