On 26/03/07, john bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 02:26 +0100, Nick Morrott wrote: > > I'm in the process tonight of writing a simple patch for the > > mythbackend init scripts in MythTV SVN to add pidfile support and a > > sample logrotate script. > > i've been reading this discussion for a while. i find myself a bit > concerned about it. > > simplicity is almost always better. all, i think, linux systems come > with logrotate already. > > the m$ way would be to have every program do it's own log rotation. and > that's a pretty awful way to do it, IMHO. > > i don't understand why any program wouldn't just build itself into > logrotate and do it the 'easy'/'official'/'normal' way to start with. > > having 50 different programs with their own logrotate code is the way of > madness.
Maybe the users of those 50 different programs have different log rotation needs? What I mentioned above (and what this thread concerts) was a logrotate logfile-specific *config* file, not reimplementing logrotate. If you read the logrotate manpage, you'll see this is how things are done. You can always specify logrotate defaults for all programs on the system and use those for all programs, if you want to. If you have one program general >100MBs data/day, and another generating <100kb/month, you probably want different logrotate settings, no? Nick -- MythTV Official wiki: http://mythtv.org/wiki/ MythTV users list archive: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users "An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
