On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Kim Bisgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> Hi Axel, > > Are you having trouble compiling nvidia-graphics100.14.19 kmdl for the > 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 kernel, or is the 100.xxx of nvidia-graphics on the way > out? > > > I would not count on that. I built nvidia 169.12-169.12-97 for kernel 2.6.25 and although X starts, I get in my logs: Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006b258000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: please see the README section on Cache Aliasing for more information Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006b259000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006bdd8000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006a428000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006b0ec000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006a434000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006a435000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006a436000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006a437000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b Jun 6 17:51:52 cascavel kernel: NVRM: bad caching on address 0xffff81006a400000: actual 0x173 != expected 0x17b In my opinion, for kernel 2.6.25, one should use version 173.14.05-173.14.05-98. If you can't upgrade the driver, it is better to use and older kernel. But you can try. Your millage may vary ... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
