On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:03:35AM -0400, Brian Long wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > In fact due to lack of space F7 at ATrpms is being removed, both the > > > mirror and ATrpms' own package (as had been the case with FC6 and > > > before and will happen again with F8 and so on once their EOL passes). > > > -- > > > > Just out of curiosity, how much space is required to store a full > > version of atrpms for F7? > > > > If it is just a question of buying a relatively inexpensive disk drive > > or two, I would consider chipping in a donation. I assume if we even > > got just $5-10 a person from a portion of the atrpms fans, that it > > could go a long way perhaps to solving storage shortages... > > > I agree. I have a few 250GB SATA disks I could mail to Germany if it would > help. :-)
Thanks to both. The hard drive array should be upgraded, but that wouldn't save F7. I can't justify upgrading F7 components at ATrpms if I know that the base components like the kernel/glibc will not be upgraded by the upstream vendor in case of a secuity issue. Which even wouldn't be known to me as EOL'd distributions don't get any notifications about what security issues are there. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
