On Wednesday 09 September 2009 17:37:53 John Pilkington wrote: <snip>
> > Thanks for the response John P. I totally understand that if I > > upgrade to a new kernel before the kmdl is available then it is my > > tough luck, so to speak. However, two things prompted my question. > > First, all the other NVidia kmdls (as well as a lot of other kmdls for > > this kernel) showed up in the repo on September 7th, so I was a bit > > surprised that the 173.xx kmdls weren't there. Second, and more > > surprising, is that not only aren't the NVidia 173.xx kmdls in the > > repo, but all the 173.xx pacakges (regular package, libs package, > > devel package, etc.) are missing as well. This is leading me to > > believe that the 173 series may no longer be made available in the > > ATrpms repo, even though it is still a relevant driver for those of us > > with FX5200 (and other "5" series) cards. > > > > John > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:07:03PM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > > > Hi Axel: I don't know how you choose which of the innumerable nvidia > > > drivers to support, > > Axel's response, the same day: > > Actually with nvidia it's "if it still (sanely) builds, support it". > > ... but of course circumstances may change. > > John P > > > _______________________________________________ > atrpms-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users RPMFusion has a kmod (kmdl) for 173.14.20. Perhaps Axel needs to change from 173.14.18 to 173.14.20 in order for the build to work? Not sure if 173.14.18 even supports 2.6.30 kernels. -- Harry O. _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
