BTW, this was on CentOS 5.4.

A bit more investigation shows that libtheora{dec,enc} is in atrpms-testing (which I don't enable); seems like it should be moved to stable or ffmpeg rebuilt without it.

Axel: would it be appropriate to update your installation instructions to include yum configuration stanzas for -testing and -bleeding with "enabled=no"?

Thanks again!


On 04/10/2010 06:15 PM, Chris Schanzle wrote:
For the last few days, I've seen this as part of a regular 'yum update' - below is i386; x86_64 is similar - I think it may be due to the recent ffmpeg rebuild.

libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 from atrpms has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libtheoradec.so.1 is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 from atrpms has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libtheoradec.so.1(libtheoradec_1.0) is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 from atrpms has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libtheoraenc.so.1 is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 from atrpms has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libtheoraenc.so.1(libtheoraenc_1.0) is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) Error: Missing Dependency: libtheoradec.so.1(libtheoradec_1.0) is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) Error: Missing Dependency: libtheoraenc.so.1 is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) Error: Missing Dependency: libtheoraenc.so.1(libtheoraenc_1.0) is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms) Error: Missing Dependency: libtheoradec.so.1 is needed by package libavcodec52-0.5.1-33_git20100404.el5.i386 (atrpms)

Thanks!



_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to