On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:52:01PM +0100, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 19/05/10 20:30, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:51:21AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote:
> >>I have mythtv 0.23-234 installed on f12 and CentOS5.5 boxes, with local
> >>copies of downloaded packages in a smart rpm-dir cache.  Smart shows
> >>the mythvideo and mythweather packages twice: once (uninstalled) as
> >>existing in the ATrpms repo, and once (installed) as existing in the
> >>RPM database and in the local cache.  All the other packages are
> >>shown only once, as existing in all three places.
> >>
> >>I'm not sure if this really did make it more difficult to ensure that
> >>the right set of packages eventually got installed, but it had me
> >>confused and seems worth a comment.
> >
> >Doesn't really sound consistent - I would expect all mythtv packages
> >to behave the same way. Try smart clean and check again to see whether
> >it was a hickup in smart.
> 
> I moved the cached packages out and did a 'smart clean'.  It made no
> difference.  For just these two packages the RPM database and the
> repo are shown as distinct, with the repo instance always
> uninstalled. Uninstalling either of the instances shown as installed
> will uninstall mythplugins too; after that all three can all be
> reinstalled and we're back to the situation as described. :-)

Maybe this is a bug in smart. I don't know what makes mythvideo and
mythweather special compared to the other modules. :/
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpIdp8QKuyLX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to